March 16, 2012
British Museum gives copies of Oxus Treasures to Tajikistan
The British Museum’s co-operation with Tajikistan on giving them copies of the Oxus treasure should be welcomed on one level. At the same time though, one has to question why countries should be grateful for having been given copies of items that they should still own in the first place? If the copies are seen as an acceptable substitute for the original, then why doesn’t the British Museum return the original & keep the copy?
From:
Trend (Azerbaijan)
The British Museum hands over copies of items from the Oxus treasure to Tajikistan
[31.08.2011 14:56]Tajik Embassy in London has conducted negotiations with the British Museum on the possibility of making copies of the most valuable items of the Oxus Treasure and handing over them to Tajikistan, a source in the Tajik government said, Asia-Plus reported.
He noted the British Museum has agreed to make copies of five items this year and donate them to Tajikistan on the occasion of the 20th anniversary of its independence.
“According to Dr. John Simpson, Assistant Keeper, Iran and Arabia Ancient Iran and Arabia Department, the British Museum, copies of other items will be made and handed over to the Tajik side next year,” added the source, “But it is impossible to make copies of the majority of items of the Oxus Treasure because they are very fragile. Therefore, the British Museum has decided to make copies only of those items that can be copied.”We will recall that in April 2007, the presidential office said that President Emomali Rahmon has given orders to take the necessary steps to return the Oxus treasure, which is kept at the British Museum.
The Oxus treasure is a collection of 170 gold and silver items from the Achaemenid Persian period dating from the 4th – 2nd centuries B.C., including vessels, armlets, seals, finger rings, and coins. Pieces from it are located in the Victoria and Albert Museum and in the British Museum, with many items bequeathed to the nation by Augustus Wollaston Franks.
The artifacts were discovered in the 19th century. A group of merchants acquired the Treasure (the precise findspot is unknown, but thought to be on the River Oxus. Oxus is the ancient name of the Amudarya River); however, on the road from Kabul to Peshawar they were captured by bandits, who dispersed the Treasure before they were rescued by Capt. F.C. Burton, the British political officer in Afghanistan. He then helped them to recover the Treasure and, in gratitude, they sold him a companion piece to one of the bracelets now at the British Museum; this companion piece is now in the Victoria and Albert Museum. These merchants then continued to Rawalpindi to sell the rest of the Treasure. Thus pieces of the Oxus Treasure were then bought from the bazaars of India, and finally ended up in the British Museum after this long journey.
- Tajikistan wants Britain to return Oxus treasure : April 6, 2007
- British Museum unlikely to return Oxus treasure : April 6, 2007
- Tajik parliament approves restitution treaty : April 14, 2009
- British Museum agrees to extend Cyrus Cylinder loan to Iran : January 28, 2011
- A case of looted artefacts or not? Chinese anger at Quing Dynasty seal : November 26, 2009
- Reconstructing China’s treasures : October 21, 2010
- Does the British Museum really need six more months to study the Cyrus Cylinder : February 10, 2010
- Afghanistan’s gradual fight to recover their cultural heritage : July 11, 2012
DR.KWAME OPOKU said,
03.16.12 at 8:26 pm
This is completely against any logic. But perhaps the claimants did not have sufficiently qualified expert advice. They should have asked the British Museum to keep the copies and return the originals to the owners.
Arguments about the fragile nature of the objects should be discounted. This is standard British Museum response to any State or people that requests the return of their looted artefacts.
Kwame Opoku