August 22, 2010
India’s recent hopes of securing the return of some of their cultural heritage appear to have been rejected by the British Government. The fact is though, that they fall back on an outdated law as a defence of the status quo – neglecting the fact that if the political will existed, the law could easily be changed to allow restitution.
Times of India
Britain rejects ASI demand for artifacts
ASHIS RAY, TNN, Jun 4, 2010, 02.12am IST
LONDON: Britain has rejected Archeological Survey of India’s demand for the return of artifacts that were carted away from India, mostly illegally, during British colonial rule. The British foreign office said domestic laws prevented museums from removing items from their collection.
‘‘The British Museum Act 1963 prevents our national museums from removing items from their collections, with the exception of human remains and objects lost during the Nazi era, and government has no plans to change the law,’’ a spokesperson of the Foreign & Commonwealth Office said.
The spokesperson said people felt strongly about the restitution debate and that museum trustees take decisions relating to the items vested in their care and politicians don’t interfere. ‘‘It’s a long-established principle in the UK, supported by successive governments.”
- MP Keith Vaz asks British Government to return the Koh-i-Noor diamond : September 28, 2010
- The Indian government is not asking for the return of the Koh-i-Noor diamond : October 19, 2010
- Could Koh-i-noor diamond be leased back to India? : February 22, 2013
- The difficultues of recovering looted artefacts : February 27, 2009
- British Prime Minister’s statements on the Koh-i-Noor diamond : September 29, 2010
- India’s mixed approach to their disputed artefacts abroad : August 16, 2016
- The Koh-i-noor and promoting Britain’s trade ties with India : February 26, 2013
- What David Cameron did not apologise for during his trip to India : February 20, 2013