March 24, 2014
Often we can learn far more from underwater heritage than from excavations on land, because many items can be better preserved by the immersion in water. On the other hand though, their location away from public view means that they are ideal targets for looters & organised excavations by commercial interests (I’m looking at you Odyssey Marine). Particularly for ship wrecks in international waters, the laws are less clear cut, over who owns the treasure discovered on board them.
Now, archaeologists are urging the UK to ratify the 2001 Unesco convention on the protection of the underwater cultural heritage. I think that this is a great aim, although seeing Britains failure so far to ratify the 1954 Hague Convention on the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, I’m not holding my breath.
Britain urged to sign up to shipwreck treaty to protect underwater heritage
The Observer, Sunday 23 March 2014
Britain’s rich maritime legacy is under threat from commercial treasure hunters who are accused by experts of plundering and destroying the nation’s underwater heritage.
A group of leading archaeologists and historians warn that unless the government intervenes to protect scores of historically significant wrecks lying beyond the country’s territorial waters, sites including the graves of those lost at sea could be exploited and lost for good.
On Monday the group, which includes leading scholars from Oxford University and the British Museum, will call on the Foreign Office, the Ministry of Defence and the Department for Culture, Media and Sport to sign up to a United Nations treaty on protecting underwater remains.
“We’ve got a wonderful reputation for dealing with cultural heritage on land, and so far we’ve got a pretty abysmal reputation for dealing with it at sea,” Barry Cunliffe, emeritus professor of European archaeology at Oxford, told the Observer.
The archaeologists want Britain to join 45 other nations in ratifying the 2001 Unesco convention on the protection of the underwater cultural heritage, a legal framework for protecting such sites. In a briefing document to be presented to William Hague, the foreign secretary, they warn that unless it signs up to the treaty, Britain will be largely incapable of protecting wrecks lying beyond its waters.
The report argues that a number of threats including natural erosion, damage from fishing vessels and illegal looting mean that “simply being hidden in deep water no longer offers protection”.
It warns that British law has no deterrent to people from taking objects from the seabed.
Britain’s maritime influence once spanned the globe, and sunken ships are the last resting place of many of its seafarers. The Royal Navy alone lost at least 2,227 vessels between 1605 and 1918; some 1,373 in foreign waters. These include HMS Aboukir, HMS Cressy and HMS Hogue, armoured cruisers which in September 1914 were patrolling off the Dutch coast when they were torpedoed by a U-boat, killing 1,459 men. Cunliffe voiced alarm that wrecks are disturbed and damaged in the hunt for cannon and potentially lucrative cargoes: “They are disturbing them in a way that no respectable archaeologist would do.” He adds that many shipwrecks are at great depths, and the techniques are “rather crude and can be very destructive”.
The report condemns Britain’s position on commercial exploitation of shipwrecks as “ambiguous, attracting financial speculation”. It said ratification of the Unesco treaty, which states that underwater cultural heritage cannot be commercially exploited, would send a strong signal to dissuade treasure hunters.
Britain was initially supportive of the treaty during 2001 draft negotiations, but abstained from voting fearing that it would not attract universal support.
Since then, the report notes, several historically seafaring states that previously shared British concerns have now signed up. These include Spain, Portugal and France. The Netherlands, another key state, is now reconsidering its position, Cunliffe said. “Germany is nearly there and Denmark is working on it fast. So we would be the only ones who hadn’t.”
The archaeologists, including Dr John Curtis of the British Museum, were brought together by the British Academy, a charity dedicated to the humanities and social sciences, and the Honor Frost Foundation, which supports underwater archaeology.
Their report says: “There are no fields of white headstones to commemorate the massed graves of those lost at sea, but ratification … will show UK [respect for] the last resting places.”
- Concern for antiquities on Greek sea bed : February 6, 2005
- Tajik parliament approves restitution treaty : April 14, 2009
- Why Britain should back the world ban on artefact looting : March 30, 2012
- New law could remove legal requirements for underwater excavations in Alabama : March 30, 2012
- Who owns the Silver coins lost on the Nuestra Señora de las Mercedes : April 25, 2011
- Elgin’s artefacts that got lost in transit : November 23, 2012
- Greece introduces draft UNESCO resolution on restitution of cultural property to countries of origin : December 18, 2012
- Who do deep sea treasures belong to? : September 4, 2007