October 20, 2004

Where are Uganda’s artefacts?

Posted at 1:53 pm in Similar cases

In the case of the Elgin Marbles, the British Museum has some level of claim over their ownership, although many people dispute its validity. In the case of the Luzira head from Uganda however, they have absolutely no claim over its ownership, yet refuse to return it after it was lent to them for studying, claiming that it would deteriorate if returned.
Apart from anything else, I find this argument insulting to the Ugandan’s, in its implication that even if they wanted to, they could not manage to obtain a single climatically controlled space in their museum for the display of this head if required.

From:
The Monitor (Kampala)

Where Are Uganda’s Artefacts?
The Monitor (Kampala)
October 17, 2004
Posted to the web October 18, 2004
Patricia Nanteza
Kampala

Everything in a museum has historic importance and deserves potent protection. If you have been to the Uganda museum, it may not have impressed you but it still stores all our pieces of ancient memories.

However some of the most important and controversial items are missing. But what are they? In whose custody are they and why? One of the most important yet missing items from the museum is the Luzira head.

It is one of the terracotta figures (fired clay object) made before 1600AD. It is Uganda’s most important item of pre-colonial art, found while digging the foundation trenches of Luzira prison in 1929.

When the Europeans who were supervising the construction found it, they handed it over to the then Government geologist Mr E.J Wayland, who had it sent to Britain for ‘studying’.

However, according to Mr Peter Bisasso, Conservator of antiquities in charge of the archeology section at the Uganda museum, “When they took it for studying, they never sent back the report nor the object.”

Attempts to ask for it have been futile, says Bisasso says. Authorities at the British museum claim that the archeological piece has stayed for long in Europe and gotten used to that kind of climate. That if they return it, it will deteriorate and break.

“This is totally absurd. The figure was made with African clay and had stayed in Africa for all that while before they found it. It is not sensible that they claim it will get dismantled from here. They then made a cast and sent it to us. It is the one standing in our museum today,” said Bisaaso.

The Luzira head is quite unique and has substantial value because it is in form of a sculpture; one of the few sculptures that are believed to have been made during the Stone Age period; it is an epitome of creativity.

It has a long neck with suggestions of necklaces around it and rings on then feet, which are indicative of either the absence of hair shaving, femineity or of a longhaired race. Its appearance could be attributed to a king; in Buganda kings like Muteesa wore rings. Tribes in western Uganda also wore rings.

According to oral tradition, the Luzira head could have been a symbol of a clan god, forming an alter piece for the shrine or temple of the Ngonge clan (Otter). The temple was likely to have been situated around Lake Victoria.

The fact that the figure was dug up from near the lakeshore, at Luzira, lends credence to oral traditions. Yet, any objects in sculpture form are believed to have come from Egypt or West Africa. So the question is, if it is not from Uganda how did it get here?

Some people have related it to witchcraft because it has bead like structures on the head. Bisasso however says: “We can relate the Luzira head to the Ngonge clan. They made the Entebbe figurings which have a slight resemblance to the Luzira head, so they could have made the Luzira head too.”

An official, only identified as Ms Rose says: “It could not have come from Egypt because by the time it is believed to have been made, the Egyptians were far ahead of such kind of art.” In case you would want to see this controversial piece of art, go to the museum, though it is only a duplicate. The original is in the British museum under accession number: AF1931, 00105,0014.

All kingdoms have drums, which symbolise authority. The Baganda have mujaguso, which is a collection of a number of drums, each protected by different people. If anyone captures these drums, a kingdom is deemed overthrown.

But the Ankole royal drums, the Bagyendamwa is mysteriously missing. Prince John Barigye, heir to the Ankole throne, says he does not have the drum. “The government of Uganda has it because the kingdom of Ankole has not been reinstated. The drum is actually in State House,” he says.

Bisaso says they have it in the museum strong room but declines to let the Sunday Monitor have a look at it. Asked why Prince Barigye does not have it, he says:

“Prince Barigye was stopped from taking the drum because the Ankole kingdom has not been restored.” However, Barigye insists that the drum is in State House. And does it mean that whoever has the drums is the reigning ruler of Ankole Kingdom?

Have you ever wondered where the posh and expensive cars that Ssekabaka (deceased king) Muteesa used to drive are? Well, they are not in the museum but buried in the ground in Mengo Lubiri palace.

I was however denied permission to see them because ‘The Kabaka does not allow the public in’. According to Mr Dick Kasolo, a press officer at Bulange Mengo, “when former President Milton Obote exiled Kabaka Muteesa in 1966, he had his cars buried and put guards to prevent anyone from removing or seeing them.
This was done for no explicable reason but jealousy. But they are no longer proper cars; it is merely scrap. With time when Buganda has finally stabilized, we hope to put the scrap in a public place for tourism purposes.”

Funny where important items can be kept!

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Possibly related articles

7 Comments »

  1. Rugona said,

    01.16.07 at 8:35 pm

    Prince Barigye should be crowned & Ankole kingdom restored. Its true the Bagyendanwa(royal drum) is in state house for reasons known to president Museveni.

  2. Prince John Barigye said,

    07.12.07 at 4:50 am

    The Royal Drums of Ankole and other royal artefacts are locked up and held illegally in an underground warehouse of the Uganda Museum. In accordance with the Uganda Comstitution and all the relevant laws that restored monarchy in Uganda they should be restored to me their rightful owner.

  3. amanyi said,

    12.03.08 at 11:54 am

    How did My ancestor,s Bagyendanwa,end up in the hands of KAGUTA?Who played with them?Who should have protected it?Now here I am,I dont even know how to speak kinyankole.I Need those drums,some one is using them for the time being to reign,though stupidly im happy with his reigning at the expense of those blessed drums.[some thing is telling me.]I believe I should protect them before something else happens to them.remember the Bachwezi are not happy,en u know them better.they never sleep.

  4. k'haya Alex said,

    08.29.09 at 11:04 pm

    kaguta is being really unfair and unrealistic.we need our king and our monarchy back.the kinyankore culture is dying out,our children can’t even speak runyankore the royal drums should be given to prince barigye instead of letting them rot in that museum.

  5. baine said,

    01.26.10 at 9:44 pm

    ankole does need king! for so many reasons! besides the majority of banyakole don’t want their king… and a king is supposed to be for the people not against the people, all the king does is depress our people. I heard how he was tormenting an old woman to leave her land, this is the same place she got married, had children, she lost some of her children and they’r buried there but the king wants her to move so he can have the land. Read this story in the news papers last year, and I couldn’t help but agree as to why the majority of banyakole don’t want a king!

  6. Mputwaki said,

    03.29.10 at 12:34 pm

    Ankole, or the remains of it doesnt need a king who unlike the Kabaka of Buganda wasand still is a uniting factor; the Omugabe of Ankole was devisive. In fact most people in Ankole celebrated when Kingdoms were abolished in 1967. The bahima bairu tension of the 60′s are no longer an issue now. A mwiru can be a cattle keeper and a muhima may actually have no cows.How can a king do these despicable acts shown bwlow:-
    1. Spitting in the mouth of his subject
    2. Piercing the foot of his subject with the opposite end of a spear(Omuhunda)
    3. Discourage modern cattle keeping and farming
    When it was time for partisan politics, Most UPC’s were protestants and DP was a preserve of catholics. In Ankole , because of the divisions there, Most Bahima, thogh Protestants, joined DP. That could explain how
    zee Byanyima joined DP.

  7. tumwine drake said,

    05.29.14 at 10:37 am

    we need our drum back, it might take long but god will punish those that have interfered with his setting. those that hate bugabe are free not to worship the king. we cant all be kings and we cant all love the setting. museveni atuhe engoma yaitu

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URL

Leave a Comment

We want to hear your views. Be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive. Remember this is for feedback and constructive discussion!
Comments may be edited or removed if they do not meet these guidelines. Repeat offenders will be blocked from posting further comments. Any comment deemed libellous by Elginism's editors will be removed.
The commenting system uses some automatic spam detection and occasionally comments do not appear instantly - please do not repost comments if they do not show up straight away