December 8, 2010
Do recent artefact returns erode James Cuno’s idea of an Encyclopaedic Museum?
Jim O’Donnell has written an interesting review of James Cuno’s book on the so-called Encyclopaedic Museum.
As with many other readers of this book, he has come across gaping flaws in some of the arguments presented by Cuno.
From:
Around The World in Eighty Years
Book Review: “Who Owns Antiquity? Museums and the Battle Over Our Ancient Heritage”
Posted on November 15, 2010Last week, New York’s Metropolitan Museum announced that it will return 19 objects from King Tut’s tomb to Egypt – 19 small bits and fragments. The Met has been quick to toot its own horn, saying the return of these objects was voluntary and that they were under no legal obligation to do anything. But we’re not talking the Rosetta Stone here. Nor the famous Nefertiti bust held in Berlin. Nor the incredible Haremhad statue detained at the Met. Nineteen trinkets is nothing to crow about. Ahhh but the magnanimous purveyos of culture will crow.
Stolen objects that reside in the great museums of the world are nothing more than a monument to imperialism and the days of overt exploitation.
Read the rest of this entry »