January 10, 2009

Museums should keep Nazi loot

Posted at 7:31 pm in Similar cases

In a move that goes against the accepted norm, Sir Norman Rosenthal is arguing that Nazi loot in museums should not be returned. An additional twist to the story is that Sir Norman Rosenthal is Jewish himself.

So. To recap – he is arguing that artefacts looted within living memory & presumably purchased without sufficient due diligence to highlight their provenance should now be regarded by everyone as completely legitimate property of the museums that now hold them, whilst the surviving heirs are left with nothing. I find it hard to see how this point of view benefits anyone other than the museums that he speaks on behalf of.

Daily Mail

Museums should be able to keep artwork raided by the Nazis, says son of Jewish refugees
By Liz Thomas
Last updated at 5:26 PM on 09th January 2009

Former Royal Academy chief Sir Norman Rosenthal has provoked anger after arguing that museums should be able to keep Nazi looted artwork.

Sir Norman, who is the son of Jewish refugees who fled from Adolf Hitler to the UK, has called for museums to be allowed to keep pieces plundered by the Nazis, rather than being forced to return them to descendents of their owners.

Holocaust campaigners and art groups have reacted angrily to the comments by the one time Royal Academy exhibitions secretary, branding him ‘out of touch’.

In a piece for the Art Newspaper, Sir Norman said it was time to put an end to restitution and argued that museums should keep stolen artwork.

He added that distant relations to people who had things taken did not have ‘inalienable rights to ownership’ now.

He wrote: ‘I believe history is history and that you can’t turn the clock back or make things good again through art. Ever since the beginning of recorded history, because of its value, art has been looted and as a result, arbitrarily distributed and disseminated throughout the world.

‘Of course, what happened in the Nazi period was unspeakable in its awfulness. I lost many relatives whom I never knew personally, and who died in concentration camps in the most horrible of circumstances.

‘But I believe grandchildren or distant relations of people who had works of art or property taken by the Nazis do not now have an inalienable right to ownership, at the beginning of the 21st century.’

His comments come as a surprise because many in the arts and Jewish community battled hard for legislation to ensure work that was looted was returned to the families it originally belonged to.

The Washington Declaration of 1998 committed 44 countries including the UK to search for plundered Nazi art and return it to its owners.

Anne Webber, co-chair of the Commission for Looted Art in Europe, said Sir Norman was ‘out of touch’, and added: ‘It is illegal to steal or to loot and this rule of law is fundamental to a free society.’

A spokeswoman for the Holocaust Educational Trust added that for many people pieces of art or documents were all they had left to hold on to their past.

She said: ‘Whether its art, or a document or any sort of relic that belonged to or is associated with their family history, for some people that will be the only way of holding on to people that perished in the holocaust.’

The government insisted that the current law was right. In a statement the Department of Culture, Media and Sport, said: ‘The wishes of the original owners should be respected and, where possible, the work returned or appropriate amends made. This is a simple, right and fair way of righting historic wrongs, and we have no plans to
resile on our commitment.’

Sir Norman became a leading figure in the British arts world during his 31 year tenure at the Royal Academy.

The 64 year-old was knighted in 2007 for his services to the industry.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Possibly related articles

Tags: , , , ,

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URL

Leave a Comment

We want to hear your views. Be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive. Remember this is for feedback and constructive discussion!
Comments may be edited or removed if they do not meet these guidelines. Repeat offenders will be blocked from posting further comments. Any comment deemed libellous by Elginism's editors will be removed.
The commenting system uses some automatic spam detection and occasionally comments do not appear instantly - please do not repost comments if they do not show up straight away